July 29, 2010  
The No. 1 trusted news site about soybean rust, brought to you by AgProfessional magazine and Greenbook, sponsored by the soybean checkoff and Bayer CropScience.

 
 
E-mail a friend | Printer Friendly

Reasons not to tank-mix herbicides and soybean-rust fungicides

From Wisconsin Crop Manager newsletter
by Chris Boerboom, Ext. Weed Scientist
and Craig Grau, Ext. Plant Pathologist
University of Wisconsin

1/312005 -- Soybean rust has been confirmed in the southern United States. While it is unknown when the rust will be introduced into Wisconsin, fungicides will be applied to control the rust when it appears.

At that time, there may be interest in tank-mixing fungicides with herbicides to reduce application costs. However, there are three good reasons why a herbicide-fungicide tank mixture may not be the best idea: improper timing, drift and labeling precautions.

Trying to make a tank mixture work for weed control and soybean rust control may result in poor performance of both pesticides. Instead, we recommend that herbicides and fungicides are applied separately for the best control of weeds and rust.

Improper timing

Considering that most soybeans are Roundup Ready, the first application of glyphosate should be applied to these soybeans when they are in the V2 or V3 growth stage. This early timing is required to control weeds before they compete with the soybeans, which would cause yield loss. It is also the best timing to get the greatest herbicide activity because the weeds are still small.

However, this timing is likely to be too early for fungicide treatments to control soybean rust. Based on the experience in other countries, the earliest fungicide treatments are often made around the R1 soybean growth stage. Because of Wisconsin’s northern latitude, the rust may not arrive until even later in the season. If a fungicide-herbicide tank mix was sprayed at the correct timing for the rust, weed control could be reduced because of the large size of the weeds.

In addition, you should not delay your herbicide application in anticipation of a herbicide-fungicide application, because the rust may not even develop in Wisconsin each year. Herbicide-fungicide applications might be timed right for one pest, but not the other, or the application might be timed wrong for both.

One situation when a herbicide-fungicide tank mixture might be appropriately timed for both pests is when a second herbicide application is being made to control late-emerging weeds. If this is the case, drift and label precautions still need to be considered.

Drift

The goals for spray coverage with herbicides and fungicides differ. For translocating herbicides like glyphosate, uniform spray distribution is required, but complete coverage of each leaf surface is not. Contact herbicides require more thorough leaf coverage than translocating herbicides, and their application may be more similar to the needs of fungicides.

Fungicides require smaller droplets and higher spray volumes to achieve maximum coverage of the soybean canopy than herbicides. This may require either different spray nozzles or higher spray pressure to generate the smaller droplets.

Some recommendations suggest that fine- to medium-sized droplets (150 - 350 VMD) are appropriate for fungicides. (VMD = volume mean diameter and is measured in microns.) However, we want larger droplets during herbicide applications to reduce the risk of drift. Medium or coarse-sized droplets (250 - 450 VMD),which are less prone to drift, are recommended for herbicides.

If the application of a herbicide-fungicide tank mixture is optimized with larger droplets to reduce herbicide drift, the performance of the fungicide may suffer. If smaller droplets are used to optimize the fungicide performance, herbicide drift is more likely.

For the best performance, fungicide applications by ground rigs should be made in a minimum of 15 gallons per acrea of water, and 20 gpa may be preferred. If a herbicide-fungicide application were to be applied at the lower spray volumes (e.g. 10 - 15 gpa) typically used for many herbicides, spray coverage with the fungicide may be compromised as well.

Label precautions

Most herbicide and fungicide labels are vague regarding the recommendations of herbicide-fungicide tank mixtures. Many soybean herbicide labels make no mention of fungicide tank mixtures, while others make generic statements that tank mixtures with other pesticides may reduce efficacy.

The product Headline allows tank-mixing with herbicides, but tank mixtures with herbicides are not addressed on most other fungicide labels. Chemical companies may make more specific recommendations in regard to the risk of incompatibility or reduced performance with tank mixtures as more experience is gained with the soybean rust.

Until that time, it may be wise to avoid tank mixtures. Likely, the greatest risk with a tank mixture is somewhat-reduced performance of glyphosate if it is applied in the higher spray volumes that are recommended for fungicides. (This reduced performance might also be associated with the fact that weeds are likely to be larger at the time of this tank mix application.)

From a legal standpoint, if both labels do not prohibit a tank mixture, it is legal for the applicator to mix and apply the tank mixture. If desired, you could try the tank mixture in a small field test, but the responsibility for performance would basically be your own.


On the Web: Wisconsin Crop Manager

 
Crop Adviser Institute
Crop Adviser Institute

Search Engine, Database, and Format Copyright 2010 © Vance Publishing Corp All rights reserved. | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Copyright/DMCA Information Copyright/DMCA Information